Data Structures- Space and Time Complexity
Observing the time complexity of different algorithms
- Space and Time Complexity
- Constant O(1)
- Linear O(n)
- Quadratic O(n^2)
- Logarithmic O(logn)
- Exponential O(2^n)
- Fibonacci Sequence
- Hacks
- Practice Time and Space Complexity Questions:
Space and Time Complexity
Space complexity refers to the amount of memory used by an algorithm to complete its execution, as a function of the size of the input. The space complexity of an algorithm can be affected by various factors such as the size of the input data, the data structures used in the algorithm, the number and size of temporary variables, and the recursion depth. Time complexity refers to the amount of time required by an algorithm to run as the input size grows. It is usually measured in terms of the "Big O" notation, which describes the upper bound of an algorithm's time complexity.
Why do you think a programmer should care about space and time complexity?
- They should care since it would save resources and enable the computer to be able to pull data much faster and allow for much faster time completing task and simplifying the process so that it completes what it needs to do
Take a look at our lassen volcano example from the data compression tech talk. The first code block is the original image. In the second code block, change the baseWidth to rescale the image.
from IPython.display import Image, display
from pathlib import Path
# prepares a series of images
def image_data(path=Path("images/"), images=None): # path of static images is defaulted
for image in images:
# File to open
image['filename'] = path / image['file'] # file with path
return images
def image_display(images):
for image in images:
display(Image(filename=image['filename']))
if __name__ == "__main__":
lassen_volcano = image_data(images=[{'source': "Peter Carolin", 'label': "Lassen Volcano", 'file': "lassen-volcano.jpg"}])
image_display(lassen_volcano)
from IPython.display import HTML, display
from pathlib import Path
from PIL import Image as pilImage
from io import BytesIO
import base64
# prepares a series of images
def image_data(path=Path("images/"), images=None): # path of static images is defaulted
for image in images:
# File to open
image['filename'] = path / image['file'] # file with path
return images
def scale_image(img):
#baseWidth = 625
#baseWidth = 1250
#baseWidth = 2500
baseWidth = 5000 # see the effect of doubling or halfing the baseWidth
#baseWidth = 10000
#baseWidth = 20000
#baseWidth = 40000
#baseWidth = 80000
scalePercent = (baseWidth/float(img.size[0]))
scaleHeight = int((float(img.size[1])*float(scalePercent)))
scale = (baseWidth, scaleHeight)
return img.resize(scale)
def image_to_base64(img, format):
with BytesIO() as buffer:
img.save(buffer, format)
return base64.b64encode(buffer.getvalue()).decode()
def image_management(image): # path of static images is defaulted
# Image open return PIL image object
img = pilImage.open(image['filename'])
# Python Image Library operations
image['format'] = img.format
image['mode'] = img.mode
image['size'] = img.size
image['width'], image['height'] = img.size
image['pixels'] = image['width'] * image['height']
# Scale the Image
img = scale_image(img)
image['pil'] = img
image['scaled_size'] = img.size
image['scaled_width'], image['scaled_height'] = img.size
image['scaled_pixels'] = image['scaled_width'] * image['scaled_height']
# Scaled HTML
image['html'] = '<img src="data:image/png;base64,%s">' % image_to_base64(image['pil'], image['format'])
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Use numpy to concatenate two arrays
images = image_data(images = [{'source': "Peter Carolin", 'label': "Lassen Volcano", 'file': "lassen-volcano.jpg"}])
# Display meta data, scaled view, and grey scale for each image
for image in images:
image_management(image)
print("---- meta data -----")
print(image['label'])
print(image['source'])
print(image['format'])
print(image['mode'])
print("Original size: ", image['size'], " pixels: ", f"{image['pixels']:,}")
print("Scaled size: ", image['scaled_size'], " pixels: ", f"{image['scaled_pixels']:,}")
print("-- original image --")
display(HTML(image['html']))
Do you think this is a time complexity or space complexity or both problem?
- This is definetly a problem for both since with each new higher scaled image, the tie required to scale it and project it takes forever since the computer needs to allocate the space for the image while also scaling it up and these two things take up a lot of space and time
numbers = list(range(1000))
print(numbers)
print(numbers[263])
ncaa_bb_ranks = {1:"Alabama",2:"Houston", 3:"Purdue", 4:"Kansas"}
#look up a value in a dictionary given a key
print(ncaa_bb_ranks[1])
Space
This function takes two number inputs and returns their sum. The function does not create any additional data structures or variables that are dependent on the input size, so its space complexity is constant, or O(1). Regardless of how large the input numbers are, the function will always require the same amount of memory to execute.
def sum(a, b):
return a + b
print(sum(90,88))
print(sum(.9,.88))
Time
An example of a linear time algorithm is traversing a list or an array. When the size of the list or array increases, the time taken to traverse it also increases linearly with the size. Hence, the time complexity of this operation is O(n), where n is the size of the list or array being traversed.
for i in numbers:
print(i)
Space
This function takes a list of elements arr as input and returns a new list with the elements in reverse order. The function creates a new list reversed_arr of the same size as arr to store the reversed elements. The size of reversed_arr depends on the size of the input arr, so the space complexity of this function is O(n). As the input size increases, the amount of memory required to execute the function also increases linearly.
def reverse_list(arr):
n = len(arr)
reversed_arr = [None] * n #create a list of None based on the length or arr
for i in range(n):
reversed_arr[n-i-1] = arr[i] #stores the value at the index of arr to the value at the index of reversed_arr starting at the beginning for arr and end for reversed_arr
return reversed_arr
print(numbers)
print(reverse_list(numbers))
Time
An example of a quadratic time algorithm is nested loops. When there are two nested loops that both iterate over the same collection, the time taken to complete the algorithm grows quadratically with the size of the collection. Hence, the time complexity of this operation is O(n^2), where n is the size of the collection being iterated over.
for i in numbers:
for j in numbers:
print(i,j)
Space
This function takes two matrices matrix1 and matrix2 as input and returns their product as a new matrix. The function creates a new matrix result with dimensions m by n to store the product of the input matrices. The size of result depends on the size of the input matrices, so the space complexity of this function is O(n^2). As the size of the input matrices increases, the amount of memory required to execute the function also increases quadratically.
- Main take away is that a new matrix is created.
def multiply_matrices(matrix1, matrix2):
m = len(matrix1)
n = len(matrix2[0])
result = [[0] * n] * m #this creates the new matrix based on the size of matrix 1 and 2
for i in range(m):
for j in range(n):
for k in range(len(matrix2)):
result[i][j] += matrix1[i][k] * matrix2[k][j]
return result
print(multiply_matrices([[1,2],[3,4]], [[3,4],[1,2]]))
Time
An example of a log time algorithm is binary search. Binary search is an algorithm that searches for a specific element in a sorted list by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. As a result, the time taken to complete the search grows logarithmically with the size of the list. Hence, the time complexity of this operation is O(log n), where n is the size of the list being searched.
def binary_search(arr, low, high, target):
while low <= high:
mid = (low + high) // 2 #integer division
if arr[mid] == target:
return mid
elif arr[mid] < target:
low = mid + 1
else:
high = mid - 1
target = 263
result = binary_search(numbers, 0, len(numbers) - 1, target)
print(result)
Space
The same algorithm above has a O(logn) space complexity. The function takes an array arr, its lower and upper bounds low and high, and a target value target. The function searches for target within the bounds of arr by recursively dividing the search space in half until the target is found or the search space is empty. The function does not create any new data structures that depend on the size of arr. Instead, the function uses the call stack to keep track of the recursive calls. Since the maximum depth of the recursive calls is O(logn), where n is the size of arr, the space complexity of this function is O(logn). As the size of arr increases, the amount of memory required to execute the function grows logarithmically.
Time
An example of an O(2^n) algorithm is the recursive implementation of the Fibonacci sequence. The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, starting from 0 and 1. The recursive implementation of the Fibonacci sequence calculates each number by recursively calling itself with the two preceding numbers until it reaches the base case (i.e., the first or second number in the sequence). The algorithm takes O(2^n) time in the worst case because it has to calculate each number in the sequence by making two recursive calls.
def fibonacci(n):
if n <= 1:
return n
else:
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)
#print(fibonacci(5))
#print(fibonacci(10))
#print(fibonacci(20))
#print(fibonacci(30))
print(fibonacci(40))
Space
This function takes a set s as input and generates all possible subsets of s. The function does this by recursively generating the subsets of the set without the first element, and then adding the first element to each of those subsets to generate the subsets that include the first element. The function creates a new list for each recursive call that stores the subsets, and each element in the list is a new list that represents a subset. The number of subsets that can be generated from a set of size n is 2^n, so the space complexity of this function is O(2^n). As the size of the input set increases, the amount of memory required to execute the function grows exponentially.
def generate_subsets(s):
if not s:
return [[]]
subsets = generate_subsets(s[1:])
return [[s[0]] + subset for subset in subsets] + subsets
#print(generate_subsets([1,2,3]))
print(generate_subsets(numbers))
Using the time library, we are able to see the difference in time it takes to calculate the fibonacci function above.
- Based on what is known about the other time complexities, hypothesize the resulting elapsed time if the function is replaced.
import time
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(34))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(35))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(36))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(37))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(38))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(39))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
start_time = time.time()
print(fibonacci(40))
end_time = time.time()
total_time = end_time - start_time
print("Time taken:", total_time, "seconds")
Hacks
- Record your findings when testing the time elapsed of the different algorithms.
When increasing the scale of the image, the longer the time it took in order for the computer to output the requested image and so way the space and resources that were rewquired for example, when doing the baseWidth of 40000, my computer's fans were really loud and spinning really fast meaning that the vscode was using alot of my CPU and memory to generate the desired image.
-
Although we will go more in depth later, time complexity is a key concept that relates to the different sorting algorithms. Do some basic research on the different types of sorting algorithms and their time complexity.
-
Why is time and space complexity important when choosing an algorithm?
When choosing an algorithm, it is very important to consider these aspects since they can affect the user's interactions with a site and also can change how long it takes for a database for example to be up and live, it can also save lots of time when your using the right algorithm for the right function.
- Should you always use a constant time algorithm / Should you never use an exponential time algorithm? Explain?
No, the uses for both one changes since they are best to be used when they are required, for example, a constant time algorithm would be most effective is it were to be used for a linear search program that looks at data is a small list, whereas the exponential time algorithm like a binary search is best to be used when the list is very big and you need to find the right answer quickly.
- What are some general patterns that you noticed to determine each algorithm's time and space complexity?
if your trying to print out a specific number, then the more complex algorithms tend to the best at locating said number but with stuff like the linear, they are better at a much more related to smaller number and are the easiest solutions Complete the Time and Space Complexity analysis questions linked below. Practice
- What is the time, and space complexity of the following code:
a = 0
b = 0
for i in range(N):
a = a + random()
for i in range(M):
b= b + random()
#1. O(N * M) time, O(1) space
#2. O(N + M) time, O(N + M) space
#3. O(N + M) time, O(1) space
#4. O(N * M) time, O(N + M) space
The answer would be 3 since the size of the space would just be that of the whole thing not just both added and time is both of them added
Correct!
Correction: Variables size does not depend on the size of the input
- What is the time complexity of the following code:
a = 0
for i in range(N):
for j in reversed(range(i,N)):
a = a + i + j
#1. O(N)
#2. O(N*log(N))
#3. O(N * Sqrt(N))
#4. O(N*N)
The answer is 4, since that is the amount of times that the code runs
Correct!
- What is the time complexity of the following code:
k = 0
for i in range(n//2,n):
for j in range(2,n,pow(2,j)):
k = k + n / 2
#1. O(n)
#2. O(N log N)
#3. O(n^2)
#4. O(n^2Logn)
The answer is 3, since the value j justs keeps doubling over and over until the value is less than or equal to n so the alg has to be a log f(x)
Correct!
- What does it mean when we say that an algorithm X is asymptotically more efficient than Y?
Options:
- X will always be a better choice for small inputs
- X will always be a better choice for large inputs
- Y will always be a better choice for small inputs
- X will always be a better choice for all inputs
The answer would be 2 since if the function is much more efficient and looks like an exponential graph, then that means that its probably more efficient for large inputs
Correct!
- What is the time complexity of the following code:
a = 0
i = N
while (i > 0):
a += i
i //= 2
#1. O(N)
#2. O(Sqrt(N))
#3. O(N / 2)
#4. O(logN)
The answer would be 2 since it would provide us with the smallest x
Wrong
Correction: The smallest x is actually given by the log function
- Which of the following best describes the useful criterion for comparing the efficiency of algorithms?
- Time
- Memory
- Both of the above
- None of the above
The answer would be both since the efficiency is determine by both of the factors not just one or the other.
Correct!
- How is time complexity measured?
- By counting the number of algorithms in an algorithm.
- By counting the number of primitive operations performed by the algorithm on a given input size.
- By counting the size of data input to the algorithm.
- None of the above
The answer would be 2
Correct!
- What will be the time complexity of the following code?
for i in range(n):
i=i*k
The answer would be 3, since the function loops infinety and eventually looks like the log f(x)
Correct!
- What will be the time complexity of the following code?
value = 0
for i in range(n):
for j in range(i):
value=value+1
The answer would be 3 since j would run for the same length as i but -1 since its only running for its range, ignoring 0
- Algorithm A and B have a worst-case running time of O(n) and O(logn), respectively. Therefore, algorithm B always runs faster than algorithm A.
- True
- False
The answer would be False since Algorithm A would be much more efficient with smaller numbers as its linear so B wouldn't always be the fastest algorithm
Correct!
Final Score: 9/10, this wasn't that bad, some tips i have is just image the graphs that each f(x) creates and you'll understand the question much better